RCPCH Conference 2027 - Abstract submission guidelines

The RCPCH Conference Organising Committee invited abstract submissions for the 2027 Conference, taking place from 19 to 21 May at the LEX Liverpool.

Abstract submissions closed on 6 September. If you submitted an abstract, please refer to these guidelines, which explain the review process, how to withdraw an abstract and each presentation format.

Review process

All abstracts are reviewed ‘blind’. No identifying features such as names of authors, names of hospitals, medical schools, clinics or cities should be listed in the title or text of the abstract. The names of the authors and their affiliations (institutions) are requested separately when the abstract is submitted online.

  • We cannot consider abstracts that have previously been published in a journal.
  • We can consider abstracts that have been presented at local and regional paediatric meetings. However, we cannot accept work that has previously been presented at an RCPCH event or another national or international conference.
  • We do not accept case reports/case studies/case series. 
  • We do not accept literature reviews.
  • You do not need to be an RCPCH member.
  • You do not need to be a paediatrician and we encourage relevant submissions across all disciplines.

Amending or withdrawing a submission

To request an amendment or withdrawal, please contact our delivery partner, Wonderly at rcpch.submissions@wonderly.agency. Include your full abstract title and abstract ID number.

Abstract submission system

Submissions closed on 6 September. 

The process is managed by our delivery partners, Wonderly (part of the Haymarket Media Group) on Oxford Abstracts.

The person submitting the abstract was able to save their work as they proceeded through the multi-step form, and could amend before the deadline. They are the only person who can view and amend the abstract. They provided their contact details, and all correspondence will be with that person.

Submission details

Topic / Specialty category

You were required to select the most appropriate specialty category. These categories correlate with the sessions taking place at RCPCH Conference. 

See categories on the abstract submission FAQs

Title

The suggested title should be succinct (maximum 160 characters) and clearly indicate the nature of the study. The titles of accepted abstracts are published in the Conference online programme and app. 

Use sentence case (ie the first letter of the sentence is capitalised, with the rest being lowercase except for proper nouns and acronyms and any words are an abbreviation (eg, RCPCH, NHS or PICU). 

Authorship

Please enter the main author and any co-authors associated with this abstract. If you would like the submitting author details to be copied over as the main author, please select the check box. 

Co-authors are not mandatory, but please ensure you add all authors at the time of submission as it will not be possible to add authors at a later stage.

You will be required to enter the co-author’s details, so ensure you have these details ready: salutation, first name, last name, organisation, job title, email address and career stage.

Should you wish to amend the presenting author, you must also provide this information to us by emailing RCPCH.submissions@wonderly.agency. The deadline to amend your presenting author is Friday 11 December.

Presenter Certificates: Please note, only Presenting Authors (including Oral presenters and ePoster only presenters) will receive a presenter certificate. Other listed Co-authors will not receive a certificate.

You must ensure that you have gained the full consent of any co-authors and have made them aware prior to adding their details to the submission.

Please note, questions on grade/career status, time taken to submit an abstract and involvement of trainees in submissions are data gathering only and are not included in the scoring process.

Conflict of interest and ethical approval

If any data presented in your abstract has resulted from a study that was either funded (in whole or part) or sponsored by a profit making organisation you will be required to provide the name of the company or organisation that provided this.

Please indicate if your study has ethical approval.

Submission declaration

You will be required to confirm your agreement to the following statement, in order for your abstract to be considered for presentation:

"I have read and agree to follow the relevant abstract submission guidelines and be responsible for the organisation of my submission, including acknowledgement of the review outcome, registration of the presenting author(s)and the submission/preparation of the presentation or poster. I understand that if my abstract is accepted the presenting author must register and pay the appropriate ticket category to attend on the day that their presentation/poster display has been allocated to.”

Publication declaration

Accepted abstracts will be published in the online supplement of the Archives of Disease in Childhood (ADC) journal. In line with the RCPCH’s agreement with the British Medical Journal (BMJ), it is our obligation to make you aware that by submitting your abstract for presentation and publication you are agreeing to the terms of the BMJ conference abstract licence agreement. We recommend that you review this licence prior to submitting your abstract. You will be asked to provide consent for this at the time of submission.

Furthermore, if you are submitting an abstract on quality improvement, please specify whether you permit for the poster to be displayed in the RCPCH QI Central Platform and reference in RCPCH promotional materials.

Dr Michael Blacow Memorial Prize

The Dr Michael Blacow Memorial Prize is awarded annually for the best paper presented in plenary session at RCPCH Conference by a paediatrician below consultant status. You will be required to confirm if you are eligible for the prize at the time of submission.

Preferred presentation type

Building on the success of our ePoster screens, we will be moving to a fully digital poster experience for Conference 2026. Therefore when submitting your abstract, you will be asked to select your presentation preference. The options are ePoster display and oral presentation or ePoster display only. 

If your abstract is accepted, the organisers from your chosen specialty category will decide which format it will take and will cater to your preference where appropriate and possible.

ePoster display and oral presentation

If selected for oral presentation, you will present your abstract at the speciality group session which it has been submitted to. The time and date of your presentation will be included in your notification email in December. 

Oral presenters will be required to attend the conference in person, at the LEX Liverpool. 

Oral presenters will also be required to produce an ePoster for display. 

ePoster display only

All ePosters will be displayed on an interactive ePoster screen and on the conference app. The ePoster display allows delegates to interact with poster authors and ask questions. Full details and poster templates will be sent following acceptance.

Plenary presentation

You do not have the option to select 'plenary presentation' as a preferred option. The plenary presentations are selected by the Conference Organising Committee. The top scoring abstract from each group will be reviewed by the Committee who will then select nine for the coveted plenary presentation slots. This is an exciting opportunity for authors to present their work to the main auditorium during the plenary sessions. Those selected for plenary presentation will be required to attend in person.

Abstract content, structure and word count

Your abstract should not exceed 470 words. There is an additional 130-word allowance for references (600 total).  

When submitting your abstract, it should be divided into four sections and presented under the following headings:  

  1. Why did you do this work? Describe relevant background and context that led to the work. This could include description of a problem, current knowledge and specific aims. 
  2. What did you do? Describe what you did, and the rationale for this. Include: any intervention(s), and how you assessed impact; nature of any data collected; approach to analysis of data.
  3. What did you find? Summarise your key findings in relation to your aims, and according to the overall approach of your work (for example qualitative or quantitative research; audit; quality improvement; etc). 
  4. What does it mean? Discuss the meaning and actual or potential impact of your findings, including how generalisable. Consider commenting on strengths and limitations.

General style guidelines:

  • Use standard abbreviations only and place any unusual abbreviation in parentheses after the full word the first time it appears.
  • Use generic names of drugs.
  • If reference is made to proprietary products or equipment, the manufacturer's name and location should be included in parentheses.
  • Please check your abstract carefully as it will not be edited.
  • Graphs, tables and images can be inserted. All images, symbols, tables, graphs and lines should be clear and distinct. Maximum file size 10MB.
  • A “blind” selection process will be used when abstracts are being reviewed. Therefore, do not include any author names or any other clear identifying information in the title or text of the abstract itself. You will be asked to submit the names of authors and their affiliations separately during the submission process.

Please note the Quality improvement and safety category has additional guidance (PDF).

References 

There is an additional 130-word allowance for references. You can use the format below to list references:

[1] Name of Source, Name of author, date
[2] Name of Source, Name of author, date

When quoting your references please use either square [1] or curved brackets (2). For example:
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a very common cardiac lesion that we come across in preterm babies especially less than 28 weeks [1].

Provided that the abstract doesn't contain patient identifiable information, we do not need to see a patient/parent consent form. It is important, however, to bear in mind that identifiable does not just refer to a patient’s name but could also be related to a specific condition, region or hospital. So please do be aware of this when submitting your abstract.

Submission agreement

  • Please do not submit multiple copies of the same abstract.
  • If your submission is accepted, the presenting author will be required to attend the conference and pay the registration fee that applies to them.
  • Registration, travel and accommodation charges are the responsibility of the presenter.
  • All correspondence will be sent to the submitting author. It is the responsibility of this person to pass on any relevant information regarding the submitted abstract and the conference to the presenting and co-authors.

Other information

You will receive an email confirmation that your submission has been received, indicating the abstract submission ID which it has been allocated. Please refer to this abstract number in all correspondence regarding the submission. Please note the email address that you supply in the Submitter Details page will be the email address used to correspond the results of your submission. If you change email addresses during this time, please let us know so we can update the system.

Please check your junk / spam folders and contact rcpch.submissions@wonderly.agency if you submit an abstract and do not receive confirmation that it has been received.